Find a Lawyer

MST. ZUBAIDA AKHTER versus STATE

Sections 365B, 452, 337A (ii), 337H (ii), 148 and 149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition The removal of the FIR applicant, who was a star prosecution witness in this case up to. The kidnapper, however, strongly denied the allegations of his abduction, and in his statement that the girl is a sole proprietor of the Nika, he was married to the petitioner with his free will and consent. And had previously refused the marriage with the other person. It had a false and manipulative document and in this regard the Registrar of the Union Council filed a criminal case under FIR under Sections 686868, 1 471 and 202020, PPC against the widow. Behind those bars, the girl also filed a lawsuit against them. Her marriage with her other man was still pending before the Judge Family Court and she was appointed for evidence to prove that the girl and the second applicant were legally married to each other. Is. Others When the marriage contract and its contents were acknowledged by both the applicants, the law would not allow others to challenge its authenticity and contents even otherwise it could be raised as to the extent to which the contract was signed. Before that, it was appropriate to make a decision about the Family Court beforehand. On the basis of the criminal proceedings against the applicants, the defendants argue that the applicant / girl was not challenged with the other person. ,, FIR registration under PPC immigration advocates phone number from Sanjwal lawyer