MESSRS SALEEM CIGARETTE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR (CUSTOMS)
Section 3 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 202 and 193 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 23 and 1993 Constitutional Request for the Recovery of Government Obligations were directed to the Customs Company, until then no goods from their business premises. Remove. The taxes payable from another company were paid in full, and at the same time the applicant company was instructed to sell - all or all of the immovable and immovable property directly or indirectly connected to it, the mortgage. , To lease or otherwise deal with it without prior authorization. Assistant Collector (Customs) The applicant company's requirement was that it was a corporate entity and that it had no concern with the defaulting company. That the customs department has no liability against it and the applicant company is neither the holding company of the defaulting company nor the applicant is the director or guarantor of the defaulting company, nor can the notice be executed. There can be no restrictions. The applicant did not fit into any controversial justification for the company's business dealings, even as both corporate bodies / associate companies or "associate initiatives" merely used to justify the term `sister concerns'. For which it has been alleged by the department to assume the responsibility of another. The applicant's corporate body was, in the circumstances, illegal and, without jurisdiction, issuing unwanted demand notices in the name of the applicant company was a gross misuse of the authority and demonstrated the absence of any authority in this department. Was strongly condemned. High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Leepa lawyer