I.T.AS. NOS. 577/KB AND 880/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 9TH JANUARY, 2007. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 577/KB AND 880/KB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 9TH JANUARY, 2007.
Estimates regarding the production of Sections 62, 52 and 24F accounts, evidence, etc., did not identify any violation of the provisions of Section 24F of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 nor did it provide for the assessment order. Refused to review a price where the tax was deducted. Under Section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance, the entire exercise was not a desk exercise only in 1979 and without any evidence or evidence, no defect was identified in the accounting method which some of The tax officer's observation on the alleged non-verification was identified. The purchase was without any basis or evidence and was not sustainable in the facts and the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
