Find a Lawyer

AMIR GHULAM ALIAS MASTER versus STATE

On the jurisdiction of the section 9 (c) court case, the accused's regional jurisdiction, on the remand of the case, the excise inspector \ h place recovered the co-accused \ h 200 to 200 grams of hashish and the accused during the FIR was registered. The case was found to be involved as a conspiracy man. And the aforementioned excise inspector raided the house of the accused at the place of place and recovered 260kg, "hashish" from his possession, no new FIR was registered in connection with the recovery. The Excise Inspector brought the accused and the property \ H to and with the aforementioned co-accused, chalked it up to the court of la H of taking the accused and the case property out of the court's jurisdiction. Was illegal. \ H at I was not even able to be part of the Excise Inspector Court to prosecute the accused for having a "charisma" that was secure in place ured K place the case was being prosecuted against the accused \ H \ Thus, The action was non-judgmental and was put aside and the case was remanded and the special court moved to \ K at, according to the law of the de novo trial. The appeal for was dealt with accordingly \ r \ n \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Mastoi lawyer