IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS NAMDAR & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS versus IN THE MATTER OF: MESSRS NAMDAR & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
Failure to submit the Audit Report signed under Sections 253 (3), 255 (3) (6), 476 and 498 revealed that the companies submitted annual accounts in compliance with Section 233 of the Ordinance 1984. Are. The accounts revealed that the accounts were signed by the company's chief executive and director, but the audit report associated with these accounts was not signed by the auditor, but was initiated by the auditor. Despite the fact that the company is presenting an account that was not authorized by the rent, the academic auditor said that the annual general meeting failed to be represented and the auditors were shocked to share the fact that the shareholders and the management had reached this point. The notice was issued which gave 14 days time to respond to the showcase notice The answer was given, but it was answered with a delay of two months due to the auditors' argument that the auditors were not the final supervisors of the shareholders. Make a report on the accounts and account books after being audited in accordance with the comp audited procedures and requirements of the Ordinance, 1984, and standards. If auditors find any irregularities, they are required to issue a revised report. The requirement was, if the accounts were said to be irregular, otherwise they would issue a clear report to the shareholders, which was the last institution to which the auditor was responsible. The auditor was also responsible for reporting to the members. Regulatory positions of any irregularities that occur during the course of their duties responsibly It should stay chartered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
