Find a Lawyer

ZAHID HAMEED versus PAHISTAN INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL LEASING LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF

Section 9 and 10 claim for bank loan recovery that the demarcation bank stated in the case that the default time was submitted in March, 1996, then in August, 1997, while the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in November 2000. Was filed for leave request. In this case, the objection to the restriction was raised, not accepting any objection to the limitation, from which the leave application to defend the case was dismissed and approved by the Banking Court. The valid judgment noted that the question regarding the limitation was requested by the legislature but was not properly answered. The banking court did not remove the detainees from the parties and there was no basis for determining the extent of the case and the fact of the law was a mixed question of fact, so after using material evidence in such a context. The decision had to be made and the judgment issued by the banking court was set aside, the conditional leave was allowed to defend the defendant. The merit was remanded in the trial and case banking court for the next decision accordingly. Was allowed \ r was n best advocate from Islamabad lawyer