Find a Lawyer

BAHADAR versus THE SATE

The definition of evidence in section 302 (b) includes the details of the incident in the FIR, including the details of the attackers, the weapons used and the injuries suffered by the complaining party of the victim after describing the facts to the policeman. Including his mind was apparently changed and the suspects were included. Witnesses in the case lived about a kilometer from the scene of the incident and could not possibly be reached when the suspects were present, as the incident lasted only 4/5 minutes. The eyewitness statement was filed the day after the incident that the complainant's subpoena could not be equated with the FIR, and it was filed either in the prosecution's case to fill millions or twelve. Adding the number of suspects to delays of more than hours was reported in reporting the case to the police itself. Did not know how to witness the cause. Given the nature of the wounds listed in the medical evidence, the germs did not prove to be hatchet. The stimulus was not proven by any independent evidence that was found after the suspect's presentation revealed that there was no blood stain, otherwise the accused. As he could not stay, he was held for about a month and the defense was requested that he be the victim of a rape in the matter which led to a harassment on his demand for wages. And it appears that the above testimony on the demand for wages is understandable and admissible, the prosecution's case was not beyond doubt. Accordingly, he was acquitted divorce advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer