Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Sections 302, 337 L (ii), 337 A (ii), 148 and 149 of the clauses were supported by the prosecution's case, for reasons of the defendant's fate through the evidence of the injured prosecutor. Could not accept because of First, he failed to appear as his own witness. Secondly, he failed to present to any of his women who, in his plea, the defendant, as per the request of the defendant, injured the complainant as well, in his own defense, the accused was cleared of cleansing. The prayer was rejected, however, and could be punished. And is consequently punished under section 302 (c), PPC. First, there was no long-standing enmity between the parties. Secondly, the parties were related to mutual and eventual outrage, which was due to the fact that the complaining party's vegetable crop was damaged by the goat herds of the accused party. The third, the accused, sustained only one injury to the victim, although he was allegedly armed with hatchet, but chose to use it in the wrong direction and avoided repeating the injury and was charged with murder. There was no compulsion to determine the question of The nature of the crime, the number of weapons and the force behind the weapon used by the accused was always taken into account, although it could carry a load of knowledge, this blow could have led to death, but certainly But he had no intention. The appeal for this part of the murder of his deceased had admitted the accused to the extent that he was sentenced under section 302 (b), PPC was sent to section 302 (c), pp. online advocate from Manoabad lawyer