Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR versus STATE

The denial of the confessional statement of the co-accused presented before the competent court, Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34, revealed that this was not an excuse statement, while its official advised. Was that it is voluntary. The Investigation Agency or adjudicating events were collected by lawful heirs against an unlawful will or accused, as revealed in the alleged confessional statement of the co-accused, confirmed in terms of the crime weapon recovery and blood stains. Apparently, two suspects were involved, with the help of the accused confessing to the crime, the hand fell in the prohibited clause of section 497, guaranteeing in-depth examination of the material available in the CCP record. The stage should be avoided, so that the qualities do not face prejudice. In view of the facts and circumstances of the trial, it appeared that the alleged crime involved bail, so the bail was denied. online advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer