Find a Lawyer

FARMAN ULLAH versus STATE

279, 320, 337G and 7 427 definitions of evidence. The accepted suspect, who was driving the tractor, applied, stopped the emergency brake and the tractor in the middle of the highway, while the pickup driven by the complainant collided with the tractor, resulting in the crash. The people in the pickup died and other people, including the complainant, were injured in the accident and the pickup was also damaged in the accident. The case has been registered that the complainant has registered a section 279, 320, 337G, 427, PRC and case against the accused / driver of the tractor. D-Sector P Investigations were investigated, but they formed their opinion on the general information, concluding that it was the complainant who was driving the pickup with great speed and negligence, which led to the accident. , Based on rumors and the complainant's license. In order to replace the complainant as the accused in the case, the complainant was placed in the accused's column without permission and approval. The QA magistrate presented all the injured witnesses and clearly charged the accused in the tragic incident. Was acquitted, but nevertheless the accused was acquitted, and the complainant, who was made an accused, was sentenced and his sentence was justified and failed to follow the law on the matter. Carefully and carefully how the complainant was charged without the proper permission of the meteor magistrate, the record shows evidence that he had been acquitted of the accused who had been accused of negligence which led to the accident. , But despite the direct evidence, the defendant filed the trial court's n top advocate from Naukot lawyer