Find a Lawyer

MESSRS IFTIKHAR CORPORATION THROUGH NADEEM & COMPANY, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 16, 32, 193, 194, 199 (3), 168 (2) and 186 Section RO 377 (I) / 2002, Para 2 Import Trade and Procedure Order 2000, Appendix A Status of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV) 2000), the impugned misunderstanding appeal approved by the Section 9 (2) Additional Collector (judiciary) was challenged in the complaint to the restraining ideological order and jurisdiction O77 (I) / 2002 paragraph 2 under section 2. And it was alleged that the customs authorities had incorrectly sent samples of their imported sprint labels to the HEJ Laboratory to determine fitness for human consumption, in response to which they took the stand. The Drill Tax Ombudsman has no jurisdiction and appeals were not dismissed by the well-known laboratory that the samples did not fit. Because human use and equipment was responsible for confiscation, and for public health, especially for the High Court, as a well-known laborer, widespread risk-related issues were rightly decided. By international standards, the goods were declared unfit for human consumption famous lower court advocate from Kohistan lawyer