MST. SHAHNAZ BIBI versus MUHAMMAD LIAQUAT ALIAS KHITTA
Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) appealed against the acquittal ocular account by the deceased's wife and the victim's son, who were natural witnesses despite being a prisoner of the house, but necessary for commitment. The question was about the time and the manner in which the incident took place and the attackers identified on the occasion was contrary to the medical evidence from the prosecution version at the time of his death, which strongly suggested this. That the incident happened at night and in the possibility that the culprit could not be identified. The darkness, the enmity between the parties could not be recognized and the secure supporting witnesses could not be relied on without independent cooperation, which was not available as a code of conduct, as a rule of caution, in each case. This cannot necessarily be applied, where direct evidence did not affect the trust and he was the master of doubts, the court should follow the principle of C in the struggle for safe administration of justice The sin was doubled and the harmony of the two courts shows that on their behalf The Supreme Court against the acquittal on the basis of the testimony of anbdary was refused to appeal the complaint did not need any intervention, the situation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
