DR. ISRAR-UL-HAQ versus MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ
Section 302/324 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal against the suspicion that was breached, which persuaded the High Court to maintain the success of the accused, was quite a suspicion which led to the prosecution of the accused. Influenced the possibility of believing in the truth. Guilt can be sought with confidence The complainant and defendant had a dispute with the accused and both the courts below rightly rejected their authenticity because their statements did not affect the trial. Molecular evidence was denied by the trial and the High Court. Because of direct evidence failing for valid reasons, the proven suspect cannot assist the prosecution. No evidence came on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime; the following courts correctly corroborated the evidence on record. And the success of the accused was confirmed by Hai. The court, on reasonable grounds, refused the appellant's leave in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Jatoi lawyer
