Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) Testimonies of Evidence The eye witnesses were natural and independent witnesses, who remained firm on the material points concerning time, place, and location, because the incidence of eye witnesses was clear. The victim had to suffer only on the other hand, otherwise the accused had confessed to his presence on the spot and had brought the firearm injuries to the victim, but in a different way, medical evidence and The circumstances of the case fully supported the ocular evidence. No crime was cleared from the scene of the incident; the recovery of arms from the accused was legally a result. He did not get out and the collar account was further reinforced after a further six months postponement of the accused's extrajudicial proceedings and the accused was lodged under Section 121. Law, 1984, to prove his defense request. But he was unable to remove such a burden, no injury, no matter what happened, the defense request was dismissed by the accused during the incident, which also provided ocular evidence. Was supported The accused not only brought the firearm with him, but he also opened fire on the victim who caused his death and thus did not do so. The amount of punishment deserves some kind of relaxation, the death sentence and the punishment of the accused are maintained immigration advocates contact from Lawrence pur lawyer