Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus MANZOOR AHMAD

Under Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii) and 452 of Section 337 (ii) and 452, PPC, the offender and the convicted offender are declared guilty, but the appellant The court acquitted the accused. The statements of the two sons of the victims who testified against them were denied, the court had no need to deny the statement of the victim for any reason which was a matter of injury. His star was a witness. ? Because the incident took place in his home where he was attacked by the defendant / accused and suffered injuries. This question was not a misrepresentation, as it was a rare occurrence, with the fact that the ocular account was fully confirmed with medical evidence. The accused should be punished, even on the basis of the sole statement of one witness, the Victim / Prosecution witness was not only a witness, but there was no reason to believe his statement as he was injured. , Which did not fully support the prosecution's case in the entire case. Recovery of blood-stained land, except in cases of murder, has no use in giving any advice to the respondents / accused, possession of circumstances, blood-stained clothes of the victim, will be negligent. Part of the investigating officer, but that could not adversely affect the trial, the trial court should have sentenced the respondent / accused under Section 324, PPC as it was one of the respondents / accused and section 324. Attempts to murder by, PPC was a mandatory supply of law even if not charged in this case under Section 324, PPC ask a advocate free from Gawadar lawyer