Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ AND ANOTHER versus STATE

Section 302/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 Murder Amd, Trial Court sentenced two accused to life imprisonment in which the High Court increased the death sentence in the amended jurisdiction, all three accused. Had charged them with the murder of the victim. The matter related to the weapons related to the crime was a financial dispute between the parties. It happened at 9pm in the darkness of the night when a bulb attached to a wooden stick was available at the scene. Prosecution witnesses opened fire on different parts of each accused. I had pointed out. The medical report revealed that the casualties were some distance away from the two wounds, as was usual to ascertain what injuries were caused by the injuries in which the accused suffered both injuries individually and The cause of death was collectively. The mediocre legal course of medicine did not rule out the possibility of cross-examination during the cross-examination. It is not easy to know which of the three attackers was responsible for such injuries. That is, the arbitrator did not face a disturbance in the trial or any High Court related to any disobedience, although the accused was bound to record valid, strong and strong reasons for the death sentence. Reasons for rejecting the trial court's opinion in the sentencing were not offered. The court immigration advocates email from Eminabad lawyer