A VI, R 1 and O XIV, R 1 Specific Release Act (I of 1877), the suit of the land suit as section 11 suit for the possession of the accused and the profit was not taken in the written statement, the defendants Had earlier moved the petition to amend the written statement before the trial court as well as the appellate court, so that the said application could be included in the written statement and the requests were dismissed for good reason, however, the court rejected the parties. The well-known evidence was not prevented. ?? In such cases, the trial was unnecessary in respect of the question of not forming a Seraiki-specific issue if the cases were not settled, but the allegations made by the plaintiff were challenged in a written statement and the court was required to produce evidence. If allowed, the decision was made. The formation of the matter was not illegal
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2007
