MST. RASHIDA ABDUL REHMAN versus ZAHOOR HUSSAIN
Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section S4 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (e) Oral Contract for Sale of Real Estate, Specific Performance of Such Agreement, Recovery of Claims for Wendy's But based on their claims. No independent witness was charged for the 25,000 seller evidence that the vendor and his brother, whose statements conflicted with each other regarding the place of sale, at the time of the deal and its receipt. Such receipt was not signed by the seller or by an independent witness. Recovery was silent about the terms of the contract and the terms of the sale agreement, the exact amount of the sale price and the property details were not conveyed to the seller. Read that Wendy had failed to present sufficient and false evidence to prove the sale transaction and such receipt lacked the necessary components of AV in the oral contract of sale between the vendor and the seller. A separate contract cannot be sued for specific performance on the basis of such agreement that in the circumstances the suit is dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Chowk Munda lawyer