PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MULTAN versus MESSRS KHALID HUSSAIN AND COMPANY GOVERNMENT CONTRACTORS
Article Ar 33 Arbitration Act (X of 1940 Sec), Sections 14 and 17 of the case, the matter is referred to the referee by the trial court, which both parties have agreed to be bound by their decision. After recording the evidence of the parties and scrutinizing the record, made the report. The trial court presented by him and the parties on the basis of the referee's accuracy report did not decide, nor did any party agree that the referee nominated by him had a simplicity statement. Should be presented, nor was the referee making such a statement, nor was such a case decided as arbitrator. A referee was such a report an award and not a decision or information suit to be decided by the referee trial court. But the award should have been more like a statement and not a statement. And then the trial court took serious illegal action in passing the unanimous decision to decide the matter. After inviting the parties' objections to the arbitration award, the trial court was instructed / ordered to decide the case. Outline
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
