THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N . -W . F. P., PESHAWAR versus SAHIBZADA HAYATULLAH
Article 185 (3) petitioner's petition for leave to appeal for the petitioner held that the High Court did not appreciate the evidence contained by the prosecution in its original context while acquitting the defendant. And the verdict was speculative and speculative, and the complainant as well as the prosecution witnesses and eyewitnesses fully supported the prosecution's case and there was no reason to dismiss their testimony, which needed consideration. The prohibition offered under, for the safe administration of justice, to fully reproduce the evidence of the prosecution. Eel was discharged.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Tharo Shah lawyer
