Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KARIM BUX versus STATE


Section 5 (2) of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article L85 (3) Complainant, his mother, magistrate and conscience of this case, proved the sanction of the defaulter amount on record. Was. 4,000 to the accused, who was produced before the court and exhibited in his statement under Exhibit 342, the CCP did not show any inclination of the witnesses on his false involvement in the case, The trial court had already taken a gentle approach in convicting the accused, which did not require any interference. The leave to appeal was denied to the accused in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Kundina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.