IMRAN ALI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SINDH SECRETARIAT, KARACHI
Sections 3 and 9 (4) of the Control of the Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (b) (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the accused accused / accused in a foreign country, abroad Was arrested, was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. The applicant was told that he had traveled to Pakistan from a foreign country under the agreement of implementation between Pakistan and said that the foreign country and The rest of his sentence was to pass on the occasion of the transfer, a Pakistani citizen was punished in a foreign jurisdiction. Section 9 (4) of the Transfer Ordinance 2002 must be in accordance with the laws of Pakistan and consequently a competent jurisdiction court in Pakistan may adopt the latter sentence, however, as far as the conviction is applicable, Should be in line with. In the present case by a foreign court, the total amount of heroin recovered from the applicant was 2028 4 grams, while the net amount was 867 21g provided that Section 9 (b) of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997 provided the amount of heroin The maximum sentence can be up to seven years if up to one kilo \ R Petitioner stayed behind bars for almost 10 10 years, maximum punishment could be imposed in Pakistan under which the applicant benefits from Section 382B. Can also be conveyed, the sentence of the PC is received from the date of his arrest which is 10 years from the date of his arrest, which is the facts. And sufficient conditions. Case Petitioner Directed to Release \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer