Find a Lawyer

WALI MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)

Section 114 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 suit being a landlord tenant as tenant occupying the land after being amended by the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887. The mortgage was put on hold and the rights to the property were approved, the mortgage was extinguished for all purposes, but the authorities illegally transferred the suit to the defendants. The plaintiffs claimed to be the majority of the purchasers of the land from the state trial court, as well as the appellate court, respectively, dismissed the case and the legal property filed by the defendants is payable. In cash, the matter was covered under section 114 (2) (c) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, and the payment of the cash compensation was confirmed. According to the provisions of section 114 (2) of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, the land was occupied by the tenant. The landlord will get rid of all the obstacles arising in connection with this land, illegally violating the explicit provision of the law, was included in the Revenue Record itself on the grant of proprietary rights to the plaintiffs. The mortgage was extinguished, both courts failed to read the relevant law and acted without jurisdiction in refusing to grant relief to the plaintiffs to whom they were entitled. The transfer of value to the defendants was not endorsed by the fact that the admitted facts of termination of commercial tenancy and the granting of property rights to the defendants were exempted under the law free of all constraints and were given below both courts. Decisions and orders were set aside and by them divorce advocates from Ubaro lawyer