Sections 9 and 2 (d) (e) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 199 Constitution Alternatives, the defaulter of the car financing for payment of installments was the respondent bank's request that the bank hold Had an alternative alternative. By filing a civil lawsuit before the Banking Court. That the High Court had no jurisdiction to deal with the matter and it was reasonable to dismiss the plea that there was a dispute of realism in the matter, because the matter was not just payment of some installments but it was There was no real dispute. And the case was a simple matter of payment of four installments, which was serious against the applicant, which he was ready to pay promptly, as far as filing a case before the banking court was concerned. It would take years and years and the car, which the bank had taken into custody, would be damaged; there was no realistic dispute in this case, since the applicant was ready to pay the outstanding installments to the bank, / Ore, the petitioner was directed by the High Court to pay four dues and pay the installments to the bank within two days The bank will promptly issue this car to the applicant and in the future if the applicant offers a default payment for installments, the ban will have the right to confiscate the car \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
