Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF AND OTHERS versus TAUQEER AHMED

Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), including the complaining party, along with two witnesses, had no reason to pardon the co-accused against whom they had a genuine complaint, and it had made them a conscience-free person. Namely, falsely substituted with the present person. The forensic science laboratory found two crime vacancies in the presence of the suspect, who was fired from the recovered arms when the incident was not seen in the light of day in a busy market on the report of the suspect's presence. Nor could the culprit be unknown. Detectives stand trial against the accused, who killed the deceased. Such application was submitted to the Supreme Court by the trial court, the appellate court or even the accused before the accused by the affidavit, which was not brought before the trial court. , Nor did he enter the witness room under section 340 (2), the CCP conviction and the sentence of the accused did not demand any intervention, and the appeal was denied accordingly. lawer from fb area from Kundina lawyer