Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE AND OTHERS versus TUFAIL MUHAMMAD

Section 12 Government Land (Punjab) Act (IV of 1912), Section 19 Land Reform Regulations, 1972 (MLR 115), Para 24 to sell the final result of the fact by the courts under the execution of the contract There was no specific performance of the contract. Defendants denied, but because of the trial, the trial court violated the provisions of paragraph 24 of the Land Reforms Regulations, 1972 (MLR 115) and section 19 of the Public Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912 Was violated. Against the judgment and the decree relating to the trial, the result of the case was pronounced in favor of the plaintiff and the order passed by the lower appellate court was upheld by the High Court, the plaintiffs in their written statement of accuracy. Did not specifically request that the deal not ring. They were obtained either by fraud or fraudulent plaintiffs merely saying that the sale agreement was affected by the provisions of Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115) and Government Lands (Punjab). Section 19 of the Colonization Act, 1912, was the absence of misinterpretation or non-reading of the final findings of fact, filed by the High Court and the courts after the definition of the parties' evidence. The material evidence on the record of the judgment of the High Court was clearly correct which was not subject to any defect or other legal weakness to warrant interference by the Supreme Court. tax advocates from Naukundi lawyer