Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMED versus PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Article 212 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 Plaintiff's bankruptcy suit was dismissed where the warehouse keeper was merged with another bank, appellant's services were transferred to the aforesaid bank. After completing 25 years, the service of the appellant in the first bank 21 11 1972 to 20 6 1974, the full emolument due to the appellant was not paid and he was sued by the High Court, Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court. Joey suffered. And in light of this decision, after appellant attributed Malala's character to the respondents, the rest of his acquisition was paid, the appellant claimed in his claim for damages on various matters, came through the respondents. AR Written statement, his main objection was that the jurisdiction of the civil court was withheld. Under Article 1212 of the Constitution and the defendants filed a separate application under Oli VI, R 11, which was rejected, the appellant filed an appeal against the order of rejection. Respondents acknowledged that the claim for damages was in accordance with the Terms of Service. Only the 1} y service tribunal was claiming legitimate damages by the appellant because, because of the respondents' actions, the appellant was forced to resort to litigation and demanded compensation for the delay. I, they could not be cured. Under section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, its terms and conditions were not determined. Appeal was allowed by the federal legislature and was an unclean order and the order was set aside. Consequently the particulars of the appellant list of supreme court advocates from Haveli Kahuta lawyer