Find a Lawyer

LIGHT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR versus MESSRS ZSK STICKMASCHINEN GMBH AND ANOTHER

A. VII, Rr 10 & 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), for the declaration and retrieval by the respondent (foreign company) under Section 42 Agency Agreement O VII between a foreign principal and agent in Pakistan. Application for Termination of Contract of 11, CPC Settlement and the Plaintiff be directed to file their claim in the agency's contract with the foreign court for their decision on the basis of foreign jurisdiction. The defendants' convictions were that the agency contract clause was to give them exclusive jurisdiction. A foreign court (Germany), acting like a foreign arbitration clause, was obliged to stop the case. According to the laws of Pakistan, the plaintiff's claim was banned from time to time, however, German law was not affected by the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1908, and that the claimant, if any, claimed The court in Germany can be; that there was no mutual agreement between the Government of Pakistan and Germany and accordingly, if a court was approved by the Pakistan court, it could not be processed in the German court and In order to recover the money, if any, the plaintiff had to approach the German plaintiff's court on the other hand, He claimed that the exclusive jurisdiction clause is uncertain and ambiguous and accordingly, the jurisdiction of the court cannot be excluded on such an ambiguous clause. It was stated that the agency contract clause is void and cannot be prosecuted on the basis of such invalid clause under Section 28, Contract Act, 1872. That the High Court (Pakistan) not only had jurisdiction famous lower court advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer