Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KARIM AND OTHERS versus LAHORE CANTT. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

Under section 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the property was not acquired under notification of section 17 (4), the award was declared and in the presence of the landlords confirming the change in favor of the society. The landowners, who were dismissed by the Revenue Authorities, never challenged the acquisition of land and the changes were only to affect the award when, after providing possession, only through a challenging mutation, Landlords do not receive anything unless the acquisition of the land and the resulting award are challenged. The notification issued under section 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, shall be considered as separate to the extent of the landlord who challenged it, the High Court had rightly rejected the landlord's petition. And there were high-profile reasons for their contested actions being outlawed. The Mutual Challenge will have no result in the acquisition of the land and the award certified on the basis of which the Society had deposited the compensation amount and did not withdraw the entire amount but had withdrawn the property only. In accordance with section 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, the notification was canceled. best advocate from Gojra lawyer