Find a Lawyer

HIDAYATULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337 H (ii), 148, 149, 114 and 34 bail, the defendant's grant was behind bars for the past four years but the trial could not proceed despite the High Court's direction. The trial court was allowed to conclude the trial within ninety days of proceedings, although there was no further evidence as to the legal rights of the accused, but the grant of bail was always granted due to the unlawful delay in the trial. Was considered a speedy and fair trial. The purpose of the trial of each accused was to punish the accused without trial, if it was not explained, he would be guilty of the death penalty in the same manner as the execution of the law as per the directions of the superior courts. Compliance was not performed without any justification. , It can provide a reasonable basis for a bail grant, which was not complied with, and when the defendant in the counter-case was granted bail, the defendant was entitled to a discount on the bail. On the basis of the difficulties, in the circumstances, the guarantee was admitted advocate for immigration from Rohri lawyer