LIAQAT ALI versus STATE
Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Disposing of the evidence The contentious evidence advantage of the suspect was the defendant's jurisdiction against the accused / appellant when he took the deceased from his home and when he The deceased did not return. He was found guilty by a trial court of a deserted house and sentenced the accused to life imprisonment while the two accomplices were acquitted, the High Court affirmed the trial court's finding, no direct or false case against the accused. The evidence was not available and the entire case was restored. Proof of circumstance Although in the most controversial version of the murder of the victim, he did not associate the accused with the crime Proof of circumstance, which was the last seen evidence and a weak motive, has faced many weaknesses and It was not proof. Some articles related to a woman were found at the home where the body was found late and according to medical evidence some traces of nail were found on the body underneath a wound, which led to the fact that the murder mysteriously took place. Has happened, rather than interfering with the defendant's right under the principle that the accused was entitled. In any doubt arising out of the prosecution case, an indictment was taken in favor of the prosecution and against the accused. Against the principles of the administration of criminal justice, the trial court acquitted the trial court of almost the same quality of evidence against the prosecution of the accused, in which case, the case against the accused failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt, Appeal allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Ahmadpur East lawyer