Find a Lawyer

THE STATE THROUGH A.N.F. GILGIT versus CHIDI

Anti-drug force police arrested a woman, a Chinese citizen, and lodged an FIR on the charge of possessing 800 grains of heroin. During the occupation that was allegedly smuggling China, the investigating woman said that she had been provided with heroin recovered by the respondents in Islamabad police, with the permission of the special court, left for Islamabad along with the suspect. The accused were arrested and brought to Gilgit Police on charges that during the raid, 2000 grains of heroin were recovered from Islamabad police, instead of filing separate FIRs against the suspects in the police station, Islamabad, the special court. , Gilgit also demanded an indictment against the accused. Taking advantage of Section 179, Special Judge Gilgit of FIR, CCP accused the respondents as well as the respondents were also suspended which also stated that against the respondents. There is no evidence available on the record of the case; Special Judge Gilgit's conclusion was that neither the alleged heroin was recovered nor supplied by the respondents in his jurisdiction. 800 suspects of heroin were allegedly recovered from Gilgit in Islamabad by the occupation of the accused, it was a free offense under the law, neither did it act nor resulted in another being convicted. Wind. The FIR registered in Gilgit was also not a crime in Gilgit because it was related to the crime under FIR, the crime was a complete one and an independent offense was done in Islamabad, the Special Judge Gilgit had rightly said that the said crime for the top advocate from Warah lawyer