MIR GHIAS KHAN AND ANOTHER versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE/MINISTER KASHMIR AFFAIRS/NORTHERN AREAS DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (1) (b) Elderly Employee in Service (BS 17) Northern Territory Appeal Service Tribunal Territorial jurisdiction in relation to the case of such employee in relation to the matter The related matter came up first. In the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction by the High Court and the Supreme Court, but the Chief Executive and Secretary, Affairs and Northern Territories and the Federal Secretary Establishment had not raised any objection to the jurisdiction of Parliament. The request for territorial jurisdiction was not raised. Disciplinary disciplinary proceedings were initiated by the department under the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, appointments to be made by the Chief Executive under the Civil Servants Act 1973 Was and was employed by the Government Employee (Appointment, Development and Exchange) Rules, 1973, in the sense of such employee secto was `` civil servant in the Serv r \ n \ r \ n Serv r \ n \ r \ n Civil Services Act 1973. And the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide and appeal its terms and conditions of service.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Diamer lawyer