Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Promotion Section Officer, presented a sealed envelope before the court which it claimed was based on the general remarks contained in the applicant's lowdown. Collected general remarks column was deprecated. The "lowdown" was vague allegations and contradicts the remarks contained in the AC Section Officer said that the applicant was not given negative comments in the AC, which, on the contrary from 1984 to 2005, was awarded either. ? Remarks were \, \ good \ or \ very good \ and were also recommended for promotion to be unlimited of any inquiry under the Intelligence Report or NAB, ordering the selection board to insult any officer. Could otherwise have been eligible for development under R5. E) Guidelines, work quality and integrity accord for the Promotion Committee / Central Selection Board were based on numbers numbered in Arundan. With the formula in the CED supplement, which was an important factor in determining the comparative merits of an officer, Petitioner said marks were obtained under the formula, while under this rule, the eligibility limit was obtained at marks 75. Need Next Central Selection Board meeting in BPS \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
