Find a Lawyer

JAFAR versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) and 324 testimonies was doubtless advantageous to both witnesses as the events did not occur near their residence or place of business as witnesses did not progress due to their presence. Could have been The Investigation Officer did not mention the presence of any article in the column of inquiry, when there was a previous rivalry between the parties; They were outraged against each other because there were cases of attempted murder and attempted murder against each other. In such cases it can be said that the witnesses were immoral and before that they involved the criminals in criminal cases and the accused party also included the complaining party, the investigating officer did not have any material about the medical examination of the witnesses. Neither had met with a doctor or an official. The presence of any medical evidence from the hospital or any misconduct by the doctor who allegedly provided medical treatment to the prosecution's witness cannot be believed to have been stated by the prosecutor. Injuries occurred while the witness was located. The only cause of injury and the presence of the scene during the incident was declared false, both the prosecution witnesses who were motivated to contest against the defendants falsely involved in the case could not be declared. : The true witnesses and their statements cannot be believed Ocular account witnesses presented by the eye in the absence of conviction also contradict the medical evidence. famous supreme court advocate from Upper Deval lawyer