MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND NOTIFIED OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR
Article 14 (1A) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Informative Request The auction of land granted to the applicants in favor of the applicants was not in accordance with the law and, therefore, was not. Confirmed, such orders have never been challenged by the applicants, even in the present constitutional petition, therefore, the orders (not confirmed auction) have been finalized, the applicants have not been proved. Could have held that the auction was conducted in accordance with the rules and because of such a situation, a jurisdiction was created in favor of the applicants, which should be preserved in the constitutional jurisdiction. Claims that they are about to buy auction for property and should be treated as such. And the order canceled in the petitions should be set aside on the same account, it had no qualms and was rejected. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kamalia lawyer