Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 5062/LB TO 5064/LB, .4231/LB TO 4233/LB OF 1999, 3280/LB, 2880 OF 2000 AND 3989 OF 2003 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 5062/LB TO 5064/LB, .4231/LB TO 4233/LB OF 1999, 3280/LB, 2880 OF 2000 AND 3989 OF 2003

Section 13 (1) (a) irrelevant investments, etc., are considered to have been incurred by the Income Siding Officer for an increase of Rs. It was concluded that in addition to the surplus amount, Rs 30,20,638 was guaranteed and accordingly, the accuracy assessing officer had a responsibility to counter the issue in respect of all the surplus amount but he The proposed surge failed to counter the diagnosis, which was not solid in the eye. The law of the law specifically required that Assisi should provide an opportunity to explain his position in relation to any increase under the provisions of section 13 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, as the proposed increase. There was a urgent need to compete with Assisi. Not fulfilled, first appellate authority justifies deletion of said addition law firms from Garh Maharaja lawyer