IRFAN SAEED versus STATE
The 498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16 arrest bail, the defendant's denial was designated in the FIR and, on serious charges of kidnapping for committing adultery, alleged Under the Section 161 statement that the abduction allegations were made, the CCP fully supported the prosecution's case, alleging that the defendant failed to defame the complainant in any way, Since he could have been wrongly involved in the case, the accused had misused the exception in the interim order before the arrest was announced. It was alleged in court, after the trial court dismissed his bail, that he had been absconding with the law for about 24 to 24 days; there was enough evidence on record to link the accused to the charges, In the case of the 499 was also banned under the prohibited clause. CR PC bail denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Laliah lawyer