Find a Lawyer

RASHID AHMED ALIAS PAPPU versus STATE

Articles 3 and 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F Using evidence, taking advantage of suspicion, and accusing the interested witnesses / the accused against the appellant that the police party was secret after receiving a search warrant from the area magistrate. The report was raided and the accused arrested. The Federal Shariat Court upheld the retrieval case of 2500 grams of heroin and the trial court convicted the accused. The accused says that before filing a criminal case under sections 452, 341, 342, 384, 148 and 149. On the directions of the High Court, the PPC was registered against the police including the concerned police station section HO. The accused played an active role in registering a case against the police and was referred to as a witness, and that the accused had filed a habeas corpus petition in the High Court and allowed his illegal detention. To present, the police falsely implicated him. The unlawful hearing of the case against the accused by illegal and interested witnesses, as well as in any other case, was influenced by the documentary evidence that the accused was harassed to the extent that he was harassed by his wife. Forced to file damages and file a writ petition. Police were so poisoned against the accused for their release from illegal detention that he was involved in many other such cases. The accused had insisted on investigating the case against the police by another investigating agency, which further aggravated the police complaint against him. Do not make a case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt when you need a advocate from Kallat lawyer