Find a Lawyer

HUKAM KHAN versus SHAKAR

The appeal against the unlawful delay in filing Section 417 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Articles 302, 324 and 34 of the FIR was not reasonably clear that such irrational, Unreasonable and unambiguous delays will raise doubts about the truth of the prosecution's case. No doubt, it was true that the delay in filing an FIR was not always fatal to a case, but the present situation had to be taken into account and then the impact was to be assessed in the present case, in the present case. , There was no delay. A reasonable limitation would be that the respondents / accused had no involvement in the commission of the crime and were falsely implicated in the case, medical evidence, the identity of the accused involved in the crime itself or Will not establish identity. Only if the involvement of the accused involved in the crime was justified by other evidence beyond the reasonable doubt that further evidence could be sought with the help of medical evidence. Medical evidence can generally be used to support testimony or any other irrefutable evidence of this kind. And for no other purpose than to find the ocular testimony of the matter, neither the trust nor any valuable qualifications, which could not have been used to support the same victim of the accused, were the accused. There was no conclusive evidence of the crime. It was merely a dubious case against the accused that he was found guilty of the crime and the doubts could not be apprehended, depending on the fact of each case when the accused was acquitted by a court of competent jurisdiction. ? , Baby immigration advocates from Balakot lawyer