MST, NARGES BEGUM versus SECRETARY, EDUCATION (S&L) N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR
Section 5 was appointed on the basis of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 appointment, the appellant's cancellation agreement and, after assuming charge of the office, began to perform his duties, but the Department On the direction of the Political Agent, the Code of Conduct was not immediately observed by the Department of Appointment until the date of its contract, while canceling the Appointment Order not only to allege the charges and also to speak with the statement of the charges. There was a formal status, but it was an essential requirement of the law, which must be followed. Its services were dispatched in a slip-style manner without inquiry; cancellation of the appointment order was not feasible even before, the appellant sued for involvement in the service tribunal, the appellant's The appeal filed by was accepted, the inappropriate order was set aside and in the circumstances, the appellant was reinstated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
