Find a Lawyer

MST. MUQADDAS TAYABBA versus SECRETARY, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P:, PESHAWAR

R4 (1) (b) (iv) of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (1974), dismissed by the Appellant from Section 4 service for some days due to the eighth killer earthquake on duty. went. In October 2005, the appellant's brother and a sister lost their lives when their father and mother suffered severe injuries and the appellant could not stay as usual due to the disappearance of his loved ones and some days from duty. Absent a full explanation of the appellant's factual situation; being a newly married woman, because of the harrowing circumstances, caused her to have the birth of an adult adult child, causing her to suffer extensively. The hospital was undergoing treatment at Appellant due to an earthquake, but did not perform its duties as usual. Under normal circumstances, the appellant made a request for leave in response to the explanation, but was not entertained and no inquiry was made in the case nor any allegation was made against him. And he was condemned. Unless a major penalty was dismissed from the service, conditions were not justified without the proper procedure for economic investigation, the department issued an impeachment order that was not enforceable under the law But the unnecessary order was set aside on appeal with the direction of the department. Appellant's service is considered within the timeframe during the intervention period and then absent from duty, rated as abnormal leave \ r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Sargodha lawyer