Find a Lawyer

QASIM ALI SHAH versus STATE

Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Evidence Releasing Blood from the presence of an ocular account by medical evidence, the charge against the accused / appellant was that it had taken a small shot of 12 bore The gunman was murdered in connection with the trial. The accused was sentenced to life imprisonment by the High Court. He claimed that there was contradiction in the testimony of witnesses at the time of the incident. No blood was recovered from the scene of the incident and no weapon was recovered from the suspect, the Validity Post-mortem report confirmed the incident when the complainant revealed that the nature of the wounds showed They are bleeding indoors and are likely to have stains on the clothes. Blood and blood did not fall to the ground. Such an injured person, when raised immediately, was most likely excluded from the blood. Recovery of a criminal weapon from the accused was unusual as no weapons were to be recovered from the accused, who was arrested after being abducted. Two years after the brothers were charged with a complaint, the existence of a prosecution proved that the case against the accused proved beyond doubt that the appeal was dismissed. jobs for fresh advocates from Piplan lawyer