MUNICIPAL COROPRATION, MULTAN THROUGH MAYOR versus SAJJAD ALI
The claimants in Articles 8 and 42 claimed in their claim that he was a migrant and the property in dispute was transferred to him by the Settlement Authority and requested for the declaration that he was the owner of the property and he prayed for the decree In his written statement for the defendant's possession of the plates was that the suit land was transferred to him. After he paid the price and seized it, a school for boys and girls was built, which the defendant claimed was the decree and order passed without the RL II scrutiny, The only basis for the claim of record was that it showed that the following courts failed to read the evidence on the record, even though many of the documents which relied solely on the plaintiff were relieved. Therefore, they were not examined by the courts, the decisions and orders passed by both the courts were set aside and The lawsuit was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
