ABDUL AZIZ versus SAFEENA JAN
Sections 12 (2), 115 and AI, R13 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 54 Permanent injunction for a restraining case, setting aside the defendant, which was placed on notice, I failed to appear, action was taken against it. The former party's previous evidence was filed and the verdict was finally pronounced. The petition filed by the defendant for separation of the former party decree was dismissed and the appeal filed by the defendant was also dismissed, the petition filed by the defendant under section 12 (2) was also rejected. The petition, under section 12 (2), was filed by the defendants on the ground that the plaintiff suppressed the two cases before the suit in respect of the suit property and that the plaintiff After obtaining a previous party decree against the plaintiff, he was trying to seize the house illegally. Other than that, two cases were filed against the other parties and the defendant had no competence in the suit, even if the facts of the two other cases were mentioned, then the defendant had filed the defendant's behalf. The merits of the third case filed do not affect the addition, the plaintiff did not refuse to file two cases and did not state the facts at any stage; the former party against the defendant was approved. , He didn't come here. Because of the alleged concealment of facts by the trial court, the ground was invoked by the defendant in the execution of the decree passed against it, Section 12 (2), C.P.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kurram lawyer