Find a Lawyer

ALLAHDAD versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 201 and 109 of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodgood) Ordinance, (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) Guarantee, Grant of Further Investigation Neither FI Is not in R nor allegedly. Confessional statements, it was alleged that it was on the defendant's request that the victim was taken to the land of the accused, there was no mention of the accused's presence at the time of the victim's arrival and his burial. Without assigning, the accused was charged with confession, the victim was killed at the behest of the accused, nor did he say that the accused demanded the killing of the accused nor did they Has any other act attributed to the accused to indicate his involvement in the crime, the alleged confessional statements were recorded with a delay of 3 to 16 days; Hints can be drawn from established facts, but only the accuser used the complainant not to report the victim's disappearance / abduction, and the fact that the accused was reported missing from his homeland After he returned to his village and returned four days later and only then an FIR was registered, the facts and circumstances of the case justified his denial of the accused's bail on the charge of being involved in the crime. No, it does not require further investigation, while the last seen charge against a co-accused has led to the dismissal of the presumption of innocence. It won't be enough to cry. He further said that further investigation into co-accused case against co-accused was also required. The accused were admitted in bail. us immigration advocates from Hyderabad lawyer