Find a Lawyer

WAPDA THROUGH SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND OTHERS versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN

R 27 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Basic Rules, R18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Effective employee to issue notice of absence in absence of 21 years leave. Joined the WAPDA service in 1974. In 1976, he went on leave and remained absent for 21 years. The employee was issued a showcase notice on 30 9 1997 and in the Federal Service Tribunal that same year, after treating his long absence from the job. Appealed on restoration. Extraordinary leave without pay was responsible for the mistakes made by WAPDA employees not to take notice of such absence of formal WAPDA but it was the employee who was not one day but more than that. Had to justify his absence. The absence of the employee in two decades was so deliberate and unjustified that there was no need to inquire. The delay made by WAPDA was perfectly justified. I could not be allowed to rejoin, the Wapda leave rules for Wapda employees were explicitly provided in 1982 that there was even one employee with different types of addresses. By becoming an employee, if he has been absent for a fixed term, even under Rule 18 of the Basic Rules, a civil servant who has been absent continuously from duty for more than five years or without leave; I stopped living. The issuance of showcase notices may be termed as adjournment, but in this case the absence of a 21 year regular leave immigration advocate from Rajana lawyer