Sections 161 and 162 of the Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 150 and 151 define the abduction of terrorist kidnapping or acquittal of property, a false imprisonment, extortion, mischief and illegal assembly under section 161 of the Evidence Act. The witness statement recorded could not be CRPC. The prosecutor can declare his own testimony admissible in court, but he has to obtain permission from the cross-examination of the prosecutor by the prosecutor on the basis of section 161 for the examination of such testimony, processing the PC statement. Couldn't be done and safely. The negligent prosecutor cannot contest his own testimony that the witness did not sign, or the defense witnesses filed their statement under section 161, CRPC section 161, in favor of the CCP prosecution. The accused could not use the prosecution's witness statement. The testimony of witnesses listed under Section 161, CRPC, cannot be considered as substantive evidence and can be used under Article 1. The law witness, 45, of 1984 Canaan testimony, did not support the prosecution's case in the current affairs and was sentenced.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
