Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI versus MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH

Section 13 (3) law testimony (10 of 1984), Article pre79 pre-evidence seeking evidence of evidence, the notice of submission while presenting only one witness, the appellate court set aside the trial court's decision and decision. The case was heard by the appellate court, in which the trial was decided by the judge, and the order passed by the appellate court was upheld by the high court. The ploy raised by the vendor was that the pre-martyr failed to prove the notice of the student's testimony because only one witness had been presented by him to make a moderate demand in the presence of Tal two witnesses. Essentially, it was necessary that both witnesses face a cross-examination to determine their verdict of truth and the orders passed by the High Court and the lower Appellate Court were set aside and She was allowed to appeal the trial's restitution jobs for advocates from Shangla lawyer