MESSRS ABDULLAH CORPORATION versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS AND OTHERS
Section 25 and 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for illegal statement, error, etc. The showcase notice was tiled against the showcase notice under section 32 of the Customs Act 1969, the goods imported by the applicant. After the reopening of the assessment and payment of duties, it was approved, the applicant's goods were released and all he was asked to do was to respond to the post-mortem notice, according to the authorities. Since no final action was taken against the applicant, proceedings were proceeded under inappropriate showcase notice. All of the applicant's objections to the applicant's hearing were heard and those proceedings could be decided in accordance with the law, including the authorities' responsibility to deal with those objections and the law, if before then If these questions were raised, there was no scope available. Interfering with the High Court's use of constitutional jurisdiction at this stage
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
